However, at the end of the day, contrarians will concede that it is nice to know how the investing masses are doing. That’s why the data provided by Openfolio is so beautiful – it combines investing with the openness and connecting nature of social networks. Through this process, the collective portfolios of 50,000 investors can be analyzed and broken down by specific variables to bring out unique insight. Here’s a few insights from 2015 that come from their data:

1. The average investor in the U.S. was down 3.09%.

Here’s the breakdown of performance by region:

About one-third of total investors made money on the year, while two-thirds lost money on the year. Regionally, the Southeast did the poorest over 2015, mainly because of an overexposure to energy in their portfolios. So far, the average investor is already down 5.1% in 2016 YTD:

2. Older investors did better in 2015.

In a risky and volatile year, it is no surprise to see that more conservative and experienced investors did better. Openfolio’s insight here is that younger investors tend to concentrate more on individual stocks, and lack portfolio diversification.

3. Teachers had the best-performing portfolios.

Energy professionals particularly suffered, likely because of overexposure to the oil patch in their investment portfolios.

on The good news is that the Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation are taking action to restore confidence and take the appropriate measures to help provide stability in the market. With this in mind, the above infographic from New York Life Investments looks at the factors that impact bonds, how different types of bonds have historically performed across market environments, and the current bond market volatility in a broader context.

Bond Market Returns

Bonds had a historic year in 2022, posting one of the worst returns ever recorded. As interest rates rose at the fastest pace in 40 years, it pushed bond prices lower due to their inverse relationship. In a rare year, bonds dropped 13%.

Source: FactSet, 01/02/2023. Bond prices are only one part of a bond’s total return—the other looks at the income a bond provides. As interest rates have increased in the last year, it has driven higher bond yields in 2023.
Source: YCharts, 3/20/2023. With this recent performance in mind, let’s look at some other key factors that impact the bond market.

Factors Impacting Bond Markets

Interest rates play a central role in bond market dynamics. This is because they affect a bond’s price. When rates are rising, existing bonds with lower rates are less valuable and prices decline. When rates are dropping, existing bonds with higher rates are more valuable and their prices rise. In March, the Federal Reserve raised rates 25 basis points to fall within the 4.75%-5.00% range, a level not seen since September 2007. Here are projections for where the federal funds rate is headed in 2023:

Federal Reserve Projection*: 5.1% Economist Projections**: 5.3%

*Based on median estimates in the March summary of quarterly economic projections.**Projections based on March 10-15 Bloomberg economist survey. Together, interest rates and the macroenvironment can have a positive or negative effect on bonds.

Positive

Here are three variables that may affect bond prices in a positive direction:

Lower Inflation: Reduces likelihood of interest rate hikes. Lower Interest Rates: When rates are falling, bond prices are typically higher. Recession: Can prompt a cut in interest rates, boosting bond prices.

Negative

On the other hand, here are variables that may negatively impact bond prices:

Higher Inflation: Can increase the likelihood of the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates. Rising Interest Rates: Interest rate hikes lead bond prices to fall. Weaker Fundamentals: When a bond’s credit risk gets worse, its price can drop. Credit risk indicates the chance of a default, the risk of a bond issuer not making interest payments within a given time period.

Bonds have been impacted by these negative factors since inflation started rising in March 2021.

Fixed Income Opportunities

Below, we show the types of bonds that have had the best performance during rising rates and recessions.

Source: Derek Horstmeyer, George Mason University 12/3/2022. As we can see, U.S. ultrashort bonds performed the best during rising rates. Mortgage bonds outperformed during recessions, averaging 11.4% returns, but with higher volatility. U.S. long-term bonds had 7.7% average returns, the best across all market conditions. In fact, they were also a close second during recessions. When rates are rising, ultrashort bonds allow investors to capture higher rates when they mature, often with lower historical volatility.

A Closer Look at Bond Market Volatility

While bond market volatility has jumped this year, current dislocations may provide investment opportunities. Bond dislocations allow investors to buy at lower prices, factoring in that the fundamental quality of the bond remains strong. With this in mind, here are two areas of the bond market that may provide opportunities for investors:

Investment-Grade Corporate Bonds: Higher credit quality makes them potentially less vulnerable to increasing interest rates. Intermediate Bonds (2-10 Years): Allow investors to lock in higher rates.

Both types of bonds focus on quality and capturing higher yields when faced with challenging market conditions.

Finding the Upside

Much of the volatility seen in the banking sector was due to banks buying bonds during the pandemic—or even earlier—at a time when interest rates were historically low. Since then, rates have climbed considerably. Should rates moderate or stop increasing, this may present better market conditions for bonds. In this way, today’s steep discount in bond markets may present an attractive opportunity for price appreciation. At the same time, investors can potentially lock in strong yields as inflation may subside in the coming years ahead. Learn more about bond investing strategies with New York Life Investments.

The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 98The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 29The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 97The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 29The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 39The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 18The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 29The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 25The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 44The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 61The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 48The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 35The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 85The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 27The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 7The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 75The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 69The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 2The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 30The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 12The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 3The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 51The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 51The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 14The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 1The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 7The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 63The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 61The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 11The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 35The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 46The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 62The Average Investor Lost 3 1  in 2015 - 61